Tying up - Revision history

Adminsuzy at 20:14, 19 October 2020

2020-10-19T20:14:18Z

Adminsuzy at 20:09, 19 October 2020

2020-10-19T20:09:15Z

Adminsuzy at 20:08, 19 October 2020

2020-10-19T20:08:55Z

Adminsuzy at 20:08, 19 October 2020

2020-10-19T20:08:11Z

Adminsuzy at 20:07, 19 October 2020

2020-10-19T20:07:27Z

Adminsuzy at 20:05, 19 October 2020

2020-10-19T20:05:32Z

Adminsuzy at 20:02, 19 October 2020

2020-10-19T20:02:57Z

Adminsuzy: Text replacement - "German: \[\[(.*)\|" to "{{Concept translation|language=de|label=$1"

2020-09-03T17:02:27Z

Text replacement - "German: \[\[(.*)\|" to "{{Concept translation|language=de|label=$1"

Adminsuzy: Text replacement - "* Italian: [[" to "{{Concept translation|language=it|label="

2020-09-02T17:59:23Z

Text replacement - "* Italian: [[" to "{{Concept translation|language=it|label="

Adminsuzy: Text replacement - "* French: [[" to "{{Concept translation|language=fr|label="

2020-09-02T04:28:04Z

Text replacement - "* French: [[" to "{{Concept translation|language=fr|label="

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Term}}
 {{Concept relation
 |relation=Narrower
 |label=Tying up across the caps
 }}
 {{Concept relation
 |relation=HistoryNote
@@ Line 21: / Line 16: @@
 |relation=Narrower
 |label=Typing up at mid-panel
 }}
 {{Concept translation

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 |label=Tying up across the caps
 }}
 {{Concept relation
 |label=Tying up, which represented the first effort to mold the leather around the raised bands, was first used in the early 13th century. The technique seems to coincide more or less with the first use of the groove method of attaching boards. Virtually all books sewn on raised cords were "tied up" until early in the 19th century. Although [[band nippers]] are now used in lieu of tying up, the practice is still employed in the restoration of pre-19th century rare books, primarily to give the appearance of the binding technique of the times.That tying up declined after the early 19th century was probably due to several factors, including: 1) leather in trade binding was replaced by cloth; 2) sewing on raised cords itself declined; and 3) standards of finishing in fine binding were improving and neater work could be done without the use of cords and, in any event, tying up was unnecessary if the leather was properly prepared and drawn on. Large books were (and still are) tied up, especially when the covering leather is intractable. e.g., pigskin.
 |source=Etherington

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 |label=Tying up across the caps
 }}
-{{Concept relation|relation=HistoryNote|label=Tying up, which represented the first effort to mold the leather around the raised bands, was first used in the early 13th century. The technique seems to coincide more or less with the first use of the groove method of attaching boards. Virtually all books sewn on raised cords were "tied up" until early in the 19th century. Although [[band nippers]] are now used in lieu of tying up, the practice is still employed in the restoration of pre-19th century rare books, primarily to give the appearance of the binding technique of the times.
+{{Concept relation
 |label=Tying up, which represented the first effort to mold the leather around the raised bands, was first used in the early 13th century. The technique seems to coincide more or less with the first use of the groove method of attaching boards. Virtually all books sewn on raised cords were "tied up" until early in the 19th century. Although [[band nippers]] are now used in lieu of tying up, the practice is still employed in the restoration of pre-19th century rare books, primarily to give the appearance of the binding technique of the times.That tying up declined after the early 19th century was probably due to several factors, including: 1) leather in trade binding was replaced by cloth; 2) sewing on raised cords itself declined; and 3) standards of finishing in fine binding were improving and neater work could be done without the use of cords and, in any event, tying up was unnecessary if the leather was properly prepared and drawn on. Large books were (and still are) tied up, especially when the covering leather is intractable. e.g., pigskin.
-That tying up declined after the early 19th century was probably due to several factors, including: 1) leather in trade binding was replaced by cloth; 2) sewing on raised cords itself declined; and 3) standards of finishing in fine binding were improving and neater work could be done without the use of cords and, in any event, tying up was unnecessary if the leather was properly prepared and drawn on. Large books were (and still are) tied up, especially when the covering leather is intractable. e.g., pigskin.|source=Etherington}}
+|source=Etherington
 }}
 {{Concept relation
 |relation=Narrower
@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 |label=tying up
 |status=preferred
-|definition=The technique of wrapping cord tightly around a book from spine to fore edge, one cord on either side of each raised band.
+|definition=The process by which a covering skin on the spine of a book is held tightly to the bookblock, especially on each side of the raised bands and at the caps, by a length of cord wrapped tightly across the spine.
-|source=Etherington
+|source=Ligatus
 }}
 {{Concept translation

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 |label=Tying up across the caps
 }}
 {{Concept relation
 |relation=Narrower

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Term}}
-{{Concept translation|language=en|label=tying up|status=preferred}}
+{{Concept relation
-{{Concept translation|language=fr|label=fouettage des nerfs|status=preferred}}
+|relation=Broader
-{{Concept translation|language=de|label=das Abbindenstatus=preferred}}
+|label=Techniques
-{{Concept translation|language=it|label=staffilatura|status=preferred}}
+}}

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 * Dutch: (translation needed)
-{{Concept translation|language=fr|label=fouettage des nerfs|status=preferred}} German: [[das Abbinden|status=preferred}} Italian: [[staffilatura|status=preferred}} Latin: (translation needed)
+{{Concept translation|language=fr|label=fouettage des nerfs|status=preferred}} {{Concept translation|language=de|label=das Abbindenstatus=preferred}} Italian: [[staffilatura|status=preferred}} Latin: (translation needed)
 * Spanish: (translation needed)

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 * German: (translation needed)
-* Italian: [[staffilare|status=preferred}} Latin: (translation needed)
+{{Concept translation|language=it|label=staffilare|status=preferred}} Latin: (translation needed)
 * Spanish: (translation needed)